Woman in Gold - A True Story Made Boring

Matthew Parkinson | 5 Apr 2015 12:00
CineMarter - RSS 2.0
Woman in Gold Banner CineMarter

Directed by Simon Curtis. Produced by David M. Thompson and Kris Thykier. Written by Alexi Kaye Campbell. Release date: March 27, 2015.

Whenever a movie opens with the words "Based on a true story," I immediately get apprehensive. Too often, these are used as a crutch. If the movie feels cliché, filmmakers can simply say "well, that's how it happened in real life." Other times, we're drawn to feel sympathy not for what happened within the movie, but because of the true-to-life story; if we don't, we're considered heartless. It's a trick filmmakers use into manipulating an audience, and more often than not it doesn't pay off. Woman in Gold is such a film. The true story is actually more interesting than the film; it would have been better told as a documentary.

The story is based on the life of Maria Altmann, here played by Helen Mirren. An Austrian refugee who has been living in America since World War 2, her sister dies. When going through her things, Maria learns that her family used to own a painting of her aunt, Adele. The Nazis stole it. Now, Austria is trying to give back these sorts of belongings, so she hires a lawyer, Randol Schoenberg (Ryan Reynolds), to try to get the painting back. It should be an open-and-shut case, but there's a problem: the painting, Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, is worth over $100 million, and has become adored by Austria. Maria and Randol have a fight on their hands to reclaim what is rightfully Maria's.

Woman in Gold CineMarter #1

So, what we have here is a courtroom drama that spends very little time actually in the courtroom. We have maybe three scenes of this nature throughout the entire film, and most of them last for under five minutes in length. Most of Woman in Gold is spent wandering around Austria, sitting in random rooms to talk about how important the painting is, or flashing back to World War 2, when Maria was forced to leave Austria. The third of those feels the most like filler, as we get the idea in a few minutes even if the film wants to continue to go on for what seems like a quarter of its running time. The only people for whom these flashback scenes will be enlightening are those who skipped out on history class in elementary, middle, and high school. And they're not the people who are going to watch Woman in Gold.

Comments on