Kim Possible Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNRQT9ODqDI

Not quite what I expected from a Kim Possible live action movie. Seems like something is missing. Maybe when I see more.

It's a Disney Channel movie -- what do you expect?

Wow, am I the only one who thinks that looks like it was shot in 2002, and its been on ice for 16 years until CGI can fix the horrible stunts and villain? Like you can almost see the wires Kim is wearing while jumping and flying.

Even for direct to TV movies that looks bad.

Agent_Z:

Not quite what I expected from a Kim Possible live action movie.

Funny that, because it's pretty much exactly what I expected from a Kim Possible live action movie. I'm sorry, but unless they gave this thing an actual budget and got, like, Brad Bird to direct it, it didn't have a snowball's chance in hell to be any good.

Silentpony:
Wow, am I the only one who thinks that looks like it was shot in 2002, and its been on ice for 16 years until CGI can fix the horrible stunts and villain? Like you can almost see the wires Kim is wearing while jumping and flying.

Even for direct to TV movies that looks bad.

Maybe not in those words, but yeah...Not impressed by the effects, the choreography felt stilted to me...but as Casual Shinji noted, this is kinda a given considering that it's a "Disney Channel Original Movie".

Fuck Live Action.

Animation is Superior to Live Action.

I rather watch movies like Lord of the Rings and Star Wars in animation then Live Action.

I would watch the Godfather if it was animation.

Samtemdo8:

I rather watch movies like Lord of the Rings and Star Wars in animation then Live Action.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(1978_film)

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxy_of_Adventures

You technically have those options.

Hawki:

Samtemdo8:

I rather watch movies like Lord of the Rings and Star Wars in animation then Live Action.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(1978_film)

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxy_of_Adventures

You technically have those options.

I was thinking a Lord of the Rings animated CGI movie inspired by this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_168741&feature=iv&list=PL7B02F6C13BB09E91&src_vid=YWmwAdK48vg&v=8gc-RSAJpH4

Where's the Ron factor?

Looks like Rufus won't be in it. And the main girl should have shorter hair.

What was that spy movie that Frankie Muniz was in?

It looks like that...but lower budget.

What bugs me most is just how young Kim, Wade and (presumably) Ron are. Weren't they like fifteen/sixteen in the show? Here they look like they're twelve at the oldest.

Looks about right for a movie aimed at children 🤷‍♂️

twistedmic:
What bugs me most is just how young Kim, Wade and (presumably) Ron are. Weren't they like fifteen/sixteen in the show? Here they look like they're twelve at the oldest.

Granted, but how accustomed are we to having 20 somethings playing mid-teens? Might be working against that trope.

EDIT: Heck, having just re-watched it: That girl actually does look 16 years old! O_O

Basement Cat:

EDIT: Heck, having just re-watched it: That girl actually does look 16 years old! O_O

In fact she is 17...

I really don't see how this film has any gimmicks whatsoever other than just a brand name. Just watch SpyKids and you've already probably already seen this film 100 times.

Casual Shinji:
It's a Disney Channel movie -- what do you expect?

^^^^^^^^^^^

Dirty Hipsters:
What was that spy movie that Frankie Muniz was in?

It looks like that...but lower budget.

Yeah, looks like a lamer version of Cody Banks

I know it's supposed to be a kid's movie, I know it's a Disney channel made one at that, but... Yikes. NONE of that was good. Surely kids should at least deserve better than whatever this was, no?

undeadsuitor:
Where's the Ron factor?

THIS TOO. He never even got a single line!

So if MCU movies are for 12 and up... And family films like Disney animated movies are for 7-12 (and up, I guess)... This is for...?

McElroy:
So if MCU movies are for 12 and up... And family films like Disney animated movies are for 7-12 (and up, I guess)... This is for...?

Nobody

Elvis Starburst:
I know it's supposed to be a kid's movie, I know it's a Disney channel made one at that, but... Yikes. NONE of that was good. Surely kids should at least deserve better than whatever this was, no?

undeadsuitor:
Where's the Ron factor?

THIS TOO. He never even got a single line!

Why do you think disney invest in kids? They are dumb, Simple and in endless supply.

Whats the sitch?

 

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below:
With Facebook:Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with The Escapist:
Register With Facebook
Register With Facebook
or
Register for a free account here