Logo courtesy Netflix.  No logos were harmed in the creation of this banner.

Crazy nights and weekends are the stuff modern legends are made of. They do things like deprive you of money, give you interesting hickeys, or keep you from posting a regular blog feature on time. Most of the time, though, you at least have the benefit of remembering how you got into a situation where you need to delay a car payment or explain to your significant other the lipstick on your collar. Or shorts. The three gentlemen at the center of The Hangover, however, don't have that luxury. The more they discover about the best night of their lives that they can't remember, the more the audience discovers how surprisingly and raucously funny this movie is.

Courtesy Warner Bros.
Normally I'd put the poster here, but I like this shot a lot more and it's basically the same thing.

The set-up goes something like this: Doug is about to get married. His best man, a schoolteacher named Phil, is taking him to Las Vegas for his bachelor party. Along for the ride are mutual friend & dentist Stu, who is taking the opportunity to escape his shrew of a girlfriend for at least a few hours, and Doug's brother-in-law-to-be, Alan, a character that can be most charitably described as "quirky." Upon arriving in Vegas and changing for the night out, Phil takes the group to the roof, toasts with Jagermeister and says that no matter what happens, as far as anybody outside of the four of them are concerned, it didn't happen. The next morning, Phil, Stu and Alan wake to find their hotel suite a wreck, a chicken wandering in the sitting room, a tiger in the bathroom and a baby in the closet. None of them can remember a thing. Stu's lost a tooth, Alan's lost his pants, and worst of all, Phil has lost Doug.

MovieBob has gone on record to say that good comedy is pretty much "review-proof." You can't talk at length about the movie's nuances or artifice without giving away some of the humor and thus diluting the overall experience. Now, granted, Bob was talking about Hot Tub Time Machine which I saw the same night as The Hangover. In my opinion, Hot Tub is good (better than Grandma's Boy to be sure) but The Hangover is exemplary. Why? Because while I was watching it, when I recovered from the latest fit of laughter, I found myself thinking, "Wow! Somebody actually bothered to write this damn thing!"

Courtesy Warner Bros.
The chicken has all of the answers. Shame it can't talk.

Now, not all comedy required a coherent or even realistic narrative through-line. What The Hangover does just as well as its jokes is show us what can be done when a comedy has a coherent, realistic narrative through-line. As the story unfolds, the film reveals itself not just as a good adult male bonding comedy but also something of a mystery story. And while this is a comedy, it's not a shallow, easy-to-solve mystery that the Scooby-Doo gang could've knocked out. The characters need to piece together what happened over the course of that wild Vegas night, or the bride patiently preparing for the biggest day of her life won't have a groom to marry. The film's aware of the ticking clock and makes us aware of it, too, but not in such a way that it becomes too serious or overshadows the laugh. It's a well-written, well-balanced and very funny script.

Now, it's not a script that's terribly original, outside of the 'we don't remember what the hell happened last night' hook. And the characters are pretty stock - Phil's the cool guy, Stu's the henpecked guy, and Alan's just plain weird. Yeah, they're going to learn lessons about their lives in the midst of their caper, nothing new there. But what works is the fact that these characters, standard fare they may be, are presented with pretty straight-faced aplomb by the leads. Bradley Cooper in particular as Phil carries a lot of the movie, often being the voice of reason just moments after being the smirking handsome enabler of his less-fortunate friends. It's the kind of thing you'd typically see Bill Murray or Vince Vaughn doing, but Cooper does it very well. Jeffrey Tambor and Heather Graham really shine as well in their supporting roles. The father-in-law character being understanding surprised me, and while the hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold did not, Heather's still a great actress.

Courtesy Warner Bros.
Alan looks a bit like a Jewish gangster in this shot, if you ask me.

I'm running out of things I can discuss without spoiling some very funny jokes, so here's the last major point I'll make: one thing that makes The Hangover work so well is a lack of contrivance. With a couple of exceptions, everything that happens in the movie does happen for a reason that makes sense. The presence of the tiger in the bathroom, the car that arrives when the guys hand in their valet ticket, the contents of the Mercedes' trunk - none of it is resolved in a snap-of-the-fingers kind of way. There's never a wink at the audience that lesser screenwriters would use to smooth over rough spots in the script.

This isn't to say that The Hangover is free of flaws. There is a level of predictability to some of the situations, but the ones you don't see coming will surprise you. The three leads are characters you've seen before, sure. But there are other characters and a well-hyped cameo that are surprises in and of themselves. A good joke that's told well with the right timing is every bit as funny as it is when you first hear it. The Hangover does those jokes very well, and I was surprised at how much I liked it.

If you haven't seen it already, do so. If you have, it might be worth watching again, especially with some friends who might not have had the privilege. When you do get the DVD from Netflix, though, can someone please tell me why the only difference between a theatrical release and an "unrated version" is a drastically increased amount of hairy man-ass?

Josh Loomis can't always make it to the local megaplex, and thus must turn to alternative forms of cinematic entertainment. There might not be overpriced soda pop & over-buttered popcorn, and it's unclear if this week's film came in the mail or was delivered via the dark & mysterious tubes of the Internet. Only one thing is certain... IT CAME FROM NETFLIX.

I remember finding this film very funny the first time, but not the second. It just seems to be one of those films that's "the big thing" for a while then drops off everyone's radar just like that. Anyway, as immature teen-aimed comedies go, it was very enjoyable, if nothing spectacular. While not a bad film at all, its position as "the best comedy of 2009" was less of an endorsement of its quality and more a realization that there weren't any really brilliant comedies last year.

Good review, as always.

A comedy that's well written?! Brilliant!!!

I really didn't enjoy the movie very much. It was what I expected it to be, a pretty standard "guy comedy". I guess my problem wasn't with the movie itself but more with the fact that people were calling it the best thing ever, a title which it really doesn't deserve. Oh, and it seemed to be trying to spew catch-phrases, which annoyed me somewhat.

I remember seeing this film in the cinema and enjoying it immensely. And then it sort of . . . disappeared. I can't remember anyone mentioning it after that and I never thought about it again until I read this review. Which is weird, because I seem to remember it being pretty hyped at the time. My dad commented that it probably worked best as a big screen movie. Nevertheless, I'm kinda tempted to get it on DVD. The one thing I didn't like about it was *checks name* Stu's girlfriend, who was overdone and one-dimensional. But apart from that, it was hysterical.

I dunno. I didn't like it as much as others did. It's a solid comedy, but nothing exceptional in my eyes. Still...

"In the face! INNN THE FAAAACE!"

Darth Rahu:
A comedy that's well written?! Brilliant!!!


Hey BlueInk, do you take requests? I'd love to see your take on an older classic movie... timbre[?].
Like The Sting?

The movie was mediocre to me until I heard the Numa Numa song at the hotel.I agree it was somewhat predicable.Nice review.

I will watch the Hangover 2.


Hey BlueInk, do you take requests? I'd love to see your take on an older classic movie... timbre[?].
Like The Sting?

I do indeed. I recently reviewed The Adventures of Robin Hood, which might be the sort of film you'd like me to take a look at.

That review:

Request information & index of all ICFN features:

Thanks for your interest!

It was pretty entertaining, but I think it was just a bit overrated. My sides weren't splitting with laughter, but I enjoyed it.

This movie reminded me of my feelings for Superbad.

It was good, but not all that good. Not for all the hype people were making about it.

Your review is like your title. Ridiculously Awesome.

I remember watching the movie because everyone said that is was soooo awesome.
And it was, I laughed myself to tears at some scenes, but after a little while, no one mentioned the movie again. It's one of the "watch and forget" apparently.
Yes, I laughed myself to tears during the movie. If you want to tell me that my sense of humour is bad, please whut up.

I was too creeped out by the pedo character. I thought he was going to be a sort of John Belushi type. Having his character tending to the baby, and then what he had the baby simulate doing? Very creepy.

And the premise jumped the shark. Without giving it away, the premise suggested they had such a blast that they can't remember it. That is not why they can't remember the time they had.

I'll give you this: a lot of the time, a comedy's plot can interfere with the laughs. They get so caught up in the story that they forget to keep the jokes coming. I think the first time I noticed a comedy that kept the story relatively complex, but kept the jokes coming too was "Ruthless People". This one, at least, tried to do both. I just didn't laugh.

It was a fairly funny movie (not great though,) I think they tried to hard to advertise it so many times.


Reply to Thread

This thread is locked