Science Indicates Why Bad Cowboys Lose Duels

 Pages PREV 1 2
 

So....basically the reaction is quicker against someone's action?

Huh, I guess they got tired of that whole cancer thing.

Evilbunny:
Huh, I guess they got tired of that whole cancer thing.

Yeah, studying cancer is probably boring and sad. Cowboys, on the other hand, are awesome and full of win.

So if you're a bad cowboy just don't shoot first?

sidereal_day:

Yeah, studying cancer is probably boring and sad. Cowboys, on the other hand, are awesome and full of win.

Cancerous cowboys are even better.

Hrm, I read about this in the New Scientist magazine, and while they said that the reaction times of the responders were quicker, the delay between the brain realising that the competitor had moved and the person actually moving negated the effects of the quicker reaction.

Mcupobob:
I hope no tax payer money was spent in this research... Did you know that 63% of scientific studys are useless?

Did you know 67% of all statistics are made up on the spot?

OT: Thats cool. I guess. And really bringing us further to perfection as a race.

/sarcasm.

Either that, or I just suck at Halo.

(Via: Slashdot)

Permalink[/quote]not trying to crack but maybe you do suck at halo. i know i do

U just suck at Halo :D :D
No i totally get you man. I remember the same situations in Counter-Strike years ago. You`d camp a spot try to blow the head off someone and then they turn around and own your ass. Ive done it too. Oh got to love those panic headshots!

At least you don't suck at Call of Duty

 Pages PREV 1 2

Reply to Thread

Posting on this forum is disabled.