RIAA Ends Lawsuits, Goes After Your Internet Access Instead

RIAA Ends Lawsuits, Goes After Your Internet Access Instead


The Recording Industry Association of America is ready to drop its long-reviled tactic of suing individuals who illegally download music - now it's going after ISPs instead.

The RIAA has brought lawsuits against roughly 35,000 people since 2003, according to a Wall Street Journal report, bulling ahead with litigation despite the public relations disaster it created and the fact that it had negligible impact on unauthorized music sharing. Now the association says it's taking a different tack: The group has apparently worked out preliminary agreements with major ISPs in the United States, under which it will contact those ISPs when it discovers their customers are providing music to others. At that point, the ISP will either forward the complaint to the customer in question or alert them that their actions are illegal and ask them to stop. If the behavior persists, they will receive one or two further warnings and possibly reduced access speeds, and could eventually have their service cut entirely.

The RIAA didn't say which ISPs it had agreements with, and added that it reserved the right to continue individual lawsuits against people in exceptional cases. The association says it believes this new strategy will actually reach more people, a major part of its overall strategy. ""Part of the issue with infringement is for people to be aware that their actions are not anonymous," said RIAA Chairman Mitch Bainwol. He said that the lawsuits had been successful in the past, claiming that piracy would be even worse without them, but that "the marketplace has changed" and new methods of combating piracy would be more effective today.

The new RIAA master plan sounds similar to one recently announced in France, which would see "persistent pirates" lose their internet access. But the French solution is legislatived, requiring ISPs to monitor their users for piracy, and would also establish a government oversight body which would monitor the ISPs themselves. And Eric Garland, president of consultancy firm BigChampagne LLC, expressed doubts that this approach will be any more effective than the lawsuits. "There isn't any silver-bullet anti-piracy solution," he said. "It has become abundantly clear that the carrot is far more important than the stick."

One more piece of bad news for anyone already entangled in the RIAA lawsuit web: You're not off the hook. The organization said that any lawsuits already underway would be continued to their ugly conclusions.


The BPI are apparently doing the same thing over here in England

I'm yet to hear of anyone who has actually lost there service though

I suppose this is less of a PR nightmare than suing thousands of people. I wonder how those people who were sued and lost pay their settlements?

The BPI are apparently doing the same thing over here in England

I'm yet to hear of anyone who has actually lost there service though

I know, this will never work.

However, I agree with some pirates, like the ones who pirate it like a rental, and either buy it or delete it.

I'm glad they haven't really passed any of this legislation in Canada yet. So far downloading is discouraged, but not prosecuted.

Oh no. It looks like I'll just have to start burning CDs for my friends again.

It looks like they're going after the people providing the music now, not the folks who are downloading it like they used to.

The ISPs will more or less be forced to look the other way, won't they? If they stop providing service to their pirating customers, those customers will end their use of that provider won't they? It will drive customers to ISPs who refuse to be bullied the RIAA.

And while the RIAA can refuse to tell us what ISPs are doing this, the ISPs have to disclose their terms of service to their customers, meaning we'll have lists within minutes of it taking effect.

"Hey Ford...people use your trucks to do hit and runs, bank robbery getaways, and drive-by shootings. We are going to sue you if you do not make your trucks unable to be driven by those who would commit crimes."

actually they found out that's a lie, they aren't stopping lawsuits they are only saying they are stopping the lawsuits

Instead of going after the ISP's, why not focus on the source? Makes no sense since they're still trying to punish the downloaders instead of the uploaders/hosting groups/sites.
I guess this just boils down to effort. It doesn't take much effort to trace an IP back to their source, unlike tracing the upload to it's original source.

Lazy, stupid, greedy and questioning morals are the four pillars which seem to uphold the RIAA.


Reply to Thread

Posting on this forum is disabled.